|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Administrators
, Premium, Registered, WebAdmin Joined: 5/29/2009 Posts: 247
|
"John Courson, president and C.E.O. of the Mortgage Bankers Association, recently told The Wall Street Journal that homeowners who default on their mortgages should think about the “message” they will send to “their family and their kids and their friends.” Courson was implying that homeowners — record numbers of whom continue to default — have a responsibility to make good. He wasn’t referring to the people who have no choice, who can’t afford their payments. He was speaking about the rising number of folks who are voluntarily choosing not to pay."Full article here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Premium
, Registered Joined: 5/29/2009 Posts: 118
|
I just wonder whether we are sending different messages to companies and individuals. If a company is not profitable, the CEO who tears up all agreements, issues pink slips and defaults on suppliers is lionized as a "captain of industry". The poor homeowner, suckered (or not, it doesn't matter) by the mortgage company to buy a house with no verification, now has to stay and pay double or triple what the house is worth? No, what's good for the goose must surely be good for the gander...
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Premium
, Registered Joined: 5/29/2009 Posts: 118
|
There's an interesting suggestion by Professor Thaler ( here), for banks to agree to renegotiate with buyers if average home prices in their zip codes have fallen below 20%. That leaves fewer homes underwater and if the house ends up being sold for a profit, that is shared with the banks. My perception is that we may well be headed for a double dip recession with another wave of foreclosures and 'underwater' owners walking away, particularly in "nonrecourse" states like California and Arizona. Banks of course, will lose out even more. Will they agree to rework loans? Probably not. It's the greed of the monkey whose hand is trapped holding the banana and refuses to let it go and escape while the hunter calmly walks up and smashes its head in. Greed does make one stupid.
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Premium
, Registered Joined: 6/3/2009 Posts: 56
|
There is no longer any moral hazard it seems, as big bankers no longer have anything to fear from building asset bubbles that pop. Why should the consumer, the woman or man on the street. Especially in no-hazard states like California and Arizona, if your house has lost over 40% of its value, walk. Businesses do the same everyday and are hailed for it. GM just did it, Chrysler did it also...the government smiled at them and threw billions at them.
Who's kidding who?
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Premium
, Registered Joined: 7/17/2009 Posts: 30
|
I think the real issue is not finding reasons for consumers to become dishonest, but finding ways to ensure corporate integrity. It would not be a stretch to say that most large corporations have little integrity. Lax enforcement of rules and laws have only made things worse. Contracts and obligations should be honored, but, as the recent example of Toyota shows, even companies with the best of reputations can make decisions based 100% on financial gain and not on consumer safety.
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Premium
, Registered Joined: 6/3/2009 Posts: 56
|
|
|
|
|
|
YAFPro Theme Created by Jaben Cargman (Tiny Gecko)Powered by YAF |
YAF © 2003-2008, Yet Another Forum.NETThis page was generated in 0.071 seconds.