|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Administrators
, Premium, Registered, WebAdmin Joined: 5/30/2009 Posts: 103
|
We just modified our process to allow the candidate to view the letters written by the department faculty and chair. If you have this at your University, what do you think is the impact?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Administrators
, Premium, Registered, WebAdmin Joined: 5/29/2009 Posts: 373
|
I think we will end up with convoluted masterpieces of the English language that will need philosophers to decode. Essentially, "how to say no without explicitly saying no"...
Seriously, I think more transparency is better for the process and for universities in general. In industry, receiving your evaluations is standard practice. In academia, we are more secretive than is healthy. There are some reason why this might be useful, but unfortunately, it can enable bad managers to go undiscovered!!
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Premium
, Registered Joined: 7/17/2009 Posts: 36
|
In industry, you typically receive a report from your manager or managers and there is little anonymity. This is a better approach than the overly complex and secretive processes that characterize many universities.
Transparency will eliminate situations where Provosts or Deans deny tenure to faculty who have received glowing references and committee votes, but who they personally dislike. They then hide behind 'confidentiality'. Does this happen today? You bet.
|
|
|
YAFPro Theme Created by Jaben Cargman (Tiny Gecko)Powered by YAF |
YAF © 2003-2008, Yet Another Forum.NETThis page was generated in 0.036 seconds.